Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5318

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5318

Back to Table of Contents

NAME

potet_dpm.f

MODULE PROCESS (TYPE)

Calculate potential evapotranspiration; after Bauer and Vaccaro (1987) and Bauer and Mastin (1997).

DEFINITION

Module to calculate potential evapotranspiration using either the Jensen-Haise (Jensen, 1974; Jensen and others, 1990) or Priestly-Taylor (Priestly and Taylor, 1972) method.  Jensen-Haise incorporates coefficients, tx and ct for a HRU that are a function of long-term average July minimum and maximum temperatures (warmest month of the year) and altitude. Priestly-Taylor uses net radiation calculated in netrad_dpm.f module based on formulations from Bauer and Mastin (1997).

KEYWORDS

CREATION DATE 

July, 2004

PARAMETERS DECLARED

ct (calculated)

Jensen-Haise potential evapotranspiration equation coefficient, in 1/degrees.

tx (calculated)

Jensen-Haise potential evapotranspiration equation coefficient, in degrees.

petmin

Minimum daily potential evapotranspiration rate for each month, in inches.

hru_elev

Mean elevation for each HRU, in feet. [basin]

cov_type

HRU cover type: land use/cover type, from 1-31, no units. [basin]

VARIABLES DECLARED

hru_potet

Potential evapotranspiration for HRU, in inches.

EXTERNAL VARIABLES USED

hru_tmnjuly

HRU  mean minimum July temperature used for potential evapotranspiration calculations, in degrees Fahrenheit. [grid]

hru_tmxjuly

HRU  mean maximum July temperature used for potential evapotranspiration calculations, in degrees Fahrenheit. [grid]

hru_netrad

Daily net radiation for each of HRUs with cover types = 1, 2, 3, 10, 13, and 16, in cal/cm2/day.  [netrad]

hru_solrad

Daily incoming solar radiation for each of the HRUs, in langleys.  [grid]

tavf

Daily average temperature for each of the HRUs, in degrees Fahrenheit.  [grid]

DESCRIPTION

Potential evapotranspiration for a HRU is calculated using either the Priestly-Taylor method (Priestly and Taylor, 1972) for land use/cover of forest, grass, sage, water, bare soil, and impervious, or the Jensen-Haise method (Jensen, 1984; Jensen and others, 1990) for all other covers.

For the Priestly-Taylor method, the saturation vapor pressure at the average daily temperature is calculated as

satvp    = e ( (16.78*tavc-116.9)/(tavc+273.3))

where

satvp is the saturation vaporation pressure at the average temperature, in kilopascals, and

tavc is the average daily temperature, in degrees Celsius.

The slope of satvp is then calculated as

slpvp    = 4098. * satvp / (tavc+272.3)2

where

slpvp is the slope of the saturation vaporation pressure at the average temperature, in kilopascals per degree, and

tavc is the average daily temperature, in degrees Celsius.

Atmospheric pressure is calculated based on altitude,

prsr    = 101.3 – 0.003215*alt

where

prsr is the atmospheric pressure, and

alt is the altitude of the HRU, in feet.

Calculations for the latent heat of vaporization and the pschometric constant are

hvap    = 2501.0 – 2.361 * tavc

psycnst   = 1.6286 * prsr/hvap

where

hvap is latent heat of vaporization, in kilojoules/kilogram,

psycnst is the pschometric constant for altitude=alt, in kilopascals, and

other variables as defined above.

The ratio used in the Priestly-Taylor method is

ratio = slpvp / (slpvp + psycnst)

where

variables as defined above.

Last, after conversions to appropriate units, equivalent evapotransipiration (eeq) is calculated as

eeq =  ratio * slrnet / hvap

where

slrnet is the net solar radiation for the HRU (obtained from hru_netrad), and

other variables as defined above.

Potential evapotranspiration (hru_potet) is then set equal too eeq after conversion from centimeters to inches of water.

The Jensen-Haise method is used for all other land use/cover types and it written as

hru_potet(i) =  ct(i) * (tav – tx(i)) * hru_solrad(i) * 0.000673

where

nhru is the number of HRUs,

i is the index for the HRU, from 1 to nhru,

hru_solrad is the daily incoming solar radiation, in langleys per day,

0.000673 converts langleys per day (cal/cm2/day) to equivalent depth by dividing by the latent heat of vaporization and assuming a constant temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit, and

other variables as defined above.

REFERENCES

Bauer, H.H., and Mastin, M.C., 1997, Recharge from precipitation in three small glacial-till mantled catchments in the Puget Sound Lowlands: U. S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4219, 119 p.

Bauer, H.H., and Vaccaro, J.J., 1987, Documentation of a deep percolation model for estimating ground-water recharge: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 86-536, 180 p.

Jensen, M.E., ed., 1974, Consumptive use of water and irrigation water requirements: New York, American Society of Civil Engineers, Irrigation and Drainage Division, 215 p.

Jensen, M.E., Burman, R.D., and Allen, R.G., eds., 1990, Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements: A.S.C.E. Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 70, 332 p.

Priestly, C.H.B., and Taylor, R.J., 1972, On the assesment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters: Monthly Weather Review, v. 100, p. 81-92.

DEVELOPER NAME AND ADDRESS

Henry H. Bauer and John J. Vaccaro

U.S. Geological Survey

Washington Water Science Center

934 Broadway, Suite 300

Tacoma, WA 98402

Modified by:

John J. Vaccaro

U.S. Geological Survey

Washington Water Science Center

934 Broadway, Suite 300

Tacoma, WA 98402

Telephone: 253-552-1620

Fax: 253-552-1581

Email: jvaccaro@usgs.gov

Back to Table of Contents

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

Take Pride in America home page.FirstGov buttonU.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL: https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir20065318
Page Contact Information: Publications Team
Page Last Modified: Thursday, 01-Dec-2016 19:32:09 EST