Link to USGS home page
Thumbnail of cover

Comparison of Diffusion- and Pumped-Sampling Methods to Monitor Volatile Organic Compounds in Ground Water, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, July 1999-December 2002

By Stacey A. Archfield and Denis R. LeBlanc

Toxic Substances Hydrology Program
In cooperation with the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence

Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5010

Availability

This report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF).

To view and print report you will need to use PDF Viewer or Adobe Acrobat Reader (available as freeware)

Users with visual disabilities can visit this site for conversion tools and information to help make PDF files more accessible


Printable tabloid cover (6.6 MB)--1 page

Left inside cover (9 KB)--1 page

Right inside cover (11 KB)--1 page

Report (977 KB)--60 pages

 

The citation for this report, in USGS format, is as follows:

Archfield, S.A., and LeBlanc, D.R., 2005, Comparison of diffusion- and pumped-sampling methods to monitor volatile organic compounds in ground water, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, July 1999- December 2002: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5010, 53 p.


 For more information about USGS activities in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, visit the USGS MA-RI Water Science Center Home Page.

Abstract

To evaluate diffusion sampling as an alternative method to monitor volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations in ground water, concentrations in samples collected by traditional pumped-sampling methods were compared to concentrations in samples collected by diffusion-sampling methods for 89 monitoring wells at or near the Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod. Samples were analyzed for 36 VOCs. There was no substantial difference between the utility of diffusion and pumped samples to detect the presence or absence of a VOC. In wells where VOCs were detected, diffusion-sample concentrations of tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE) were significantly lower than pumped-sample concentrations. Because PCE and TCE concentrations detected in the wells dominated the calculation of many of the total VOC concentrations, when VOC concentrations were summed and compared by sampling method, visual inspection also showed a downward concentration bias in the diffusion-sample concentration.

The degree to which pumped- and diffusion-sample concentrations agreed was not a result of variability inherent within the sampling methods or the diffusion process itself. A comparison of the degree of agreement in the results from the two methods to 13 quantifiable characteristics external to the sampling methods offered only well-screen length as being related to the degree of agreement between the methods; however, there is also evidence to indicate that the flushing rate of water through the well screen affected the agreement between the sampling methods. Despite poor agreement between the concentrations obtained by the two methods at some wells, the degree to which the concentrations agree at a given well is repeatable. A one-time, well-bywell comparison between diffusion- and pumped-sampling methods could determine which wells are good candidates for the use of diffusion samplers. For wells with good method agreement, the diffusion-sampling method is a time-saving and cost-effective alternative to pumped-sampling methods in a long-term monitoring program, such as at the Massachusetts Military Reservation.

Contents

Abstract

Introduction

Purpose and Scope

Description of Study Area

Study Design

Well Selection

Monitoring-Well Construction and Installation

Data Collection

Diffusion-Sampling Method

Pumped-Sampling Method

Collection of Additional Samples

Laboratory Analysis

Data Analysis

Comparison of Diffusion- and Pumped-Sampling Methods

Comparison of Methods by Volatile Organic Compound

Comparison of Methods by Well

Comparison of Additional Samples

Quality-Assurance Samples

Replicate Samples

Repeated Sampling

Comparison of Wells Sampled with Two Pumping Methods

Samples Collected above the Well Screen

Comparison of Sampling Methods to Characteristics External to the Methods

Study Limitations, Methods Agreement, and Long-Term Monitoring

Limitations of the Study Design

Limitations of the Statistical Analyses

Factors Affecting the Agreement between Methods

Long-Term Monitoring with Diffusion Samplers at the Study Area

Summary

Acknowledgments

References Cited

Appendix: Analytical Results for Selected Volatile Organic Compounds by Well for Diffusion- and Pumped-Sampling Methods, Including Wells with Two Sets of Samples Collected or with Replicate Samples Collected, and Samples Collected for Quality Assurance, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, July 1999–December 2002

Figures

1. Map showing location of study area and monitoring well sites where groundwater samples were collected by diffusion- and pumped-sampling methods, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, July 1999– December 2002

2–4. Graphs showing:

2. Typical results of pumped- and diffusion-sample concentrations for volatile organic compounds from two wells: A, 27MW0026B; and B, 27MW0023A, at the Massachusetts Military Reservation, July 1999–December 2002

3. Comparison of pumped- and diffusion-sample concentrations for volatile organic compounds detected in ground water from A, more than six; and B, six or fewer wells at or near the Massachusetts Military Reservation, July 1999–December 2002

4. Comparison of total volatile organic compound concentrations for samples collected by pumped- and diffusion-sampling methods in wells at or near the Massachusetts Military Reservation, July 1999–December 2002

5. Comparison of A, relative percent difference between first and second sampling; and B, pumped- and diffusion-sample concentrations from repeated sampling of selected wells at or near the Massachusetts Military Reservation, July 1999–December 2002

Tables

1. Well construction and sample information for wells with samples collected by diffusion- and pumped-sampling methods, Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, July 1999–December 2002

2. Volatile organic compounds and detections of compounds in samples collected by diffusion- and pumped-sampling methods from 89 wells at or near the Massachusetts Military Reservation, July 1999–December 2002

3. Results of sign tests applied to determine if total volatile organic compound concentrations in samples collected by the diffusion-sampling method were biased relative to concentrations in samples collected by the pumpedsampling method for wells at or near the Massachusetts Military Reservation, July 1999–December 2002

4. Analysis of volatile organic compounds for samples collected from well 03MW0214B, Massachusetts Military Reservation, July 1999

5. List of quantitative characteristics explored to determine if a relation was present between the characteristic and the degree of agreement of the diffusion- and pumped-sample concentrations and the reasons why each characteristic might affect the agreement between the methods

 

 


FirstGov button  Take Pride in America button